aiassistant.sg

§How we work

The rules we can be held to

These are the working rules behind our scopes. The commitments for your engagement are the ones written into the scope you approve.

A one-page integration scope with separate sections, review marks, source tabs, a boundary marker and an approval stamp

01

Written scope before implementation

The proposed one-page scope states the outcome, systems, boundaries, delivery stages, setup cost and ongoing care. You approve that scope and its fixed quote before the build begins. Later scope changes are discussed and priced before work proceeds.

02

We start from work we know

Each package draws on an operating pattern we use in our own businesses. The written scope identifies what transfers cleanly, what needs adapting, and what is new.

03

Autonomy is earned in stages

Deployments start approval-first: the assistant drafts and prepares, humans approve. Autonomy expands lane by lane — by your decision, against a clean track record, recorded in the scope. Day-one full autonomy is something we refuse to sell.

04

Data duties are part of the design

The scope names why data is needed, where it is processed, which service providers handle it, who may access it, how long records are kept, and the available export and deletion paths. We use service terms that exclude engagement data from training shared models, and record that condition in the scope.

05

The exit is designed at the start

Every scope names the off-boarding deliverables and formats: source material, agreed operating records and configuration owned by you, plus the steps for revoking credentials and closing connections.

06

Limits are written down

Every scope names what the assistant will not do and what remains human: legal, medical and financial judgment, sensitive relationship moments, and decisions for which you retain accountability. If an assistant is the wrong tool, we say so before implementation begins.